Browse this!

Post by **miftah** » Tue May 17, 2005 10:36 am

Post by **eddiecanuck** » Tue May 17, 2005 12:58 pm

Interesting, not sure if I like that or not. Having my own webpage I like having control over what and how people see my site. But being a user I can sympathize with some of their issues.

Post by **miftah** » Tue May 17, 2005 1:01 pm

The appeal in the possibility of being able to screen out articles about the Michael Jackson trial is endless.

Pigman · Post by **Pigman** » Tue May 17, 2005 3:15 pm

miftah wrote:The appeal in the possibility of being able to screen out articles about the Michael Jackson trial is endless.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ZIPPER · Post by **ZIPPER** » Tue May 17, 2005 9:04 pm

Oh, is that still going on? You should come to my world were only relevant things get in.

Of course in my world Firefox is a MiG-31 fighter plane, but than I am rather stupid when it comes to computer technolgy. I am kinda old-fashion like that, except for my audio/video equipment.

Post by **miftah** » Tue May 17, 2005 9:14 pm

I really resent the implication that this case is supposed to mean anything to me. And I'm tired of the news media treating me like I'm a moron. Generally I know more about news stories on CNN than what they report. What makes them think they are at all qualified to inform me?

ZIPPER · Post by **ZIPPER** » Tue May 17, 2005 9:31 pm

Because it's thier job and if they didn't make you think you needed them... Well, you know.