Maybe this is why more farmers end up losing the farm

A place for anything and everything.
Post Reply
User avatar
AsaJay
pantera pilot
Posts: 596
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 8:56 am
Location: Greater Pacific Northwest

Maybe this is why more farmers end up losing the farm

Post by AsaJay » Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:39 pm

Read this
User avatar
Rocketdork
A.B. Normal
Posts: 1489
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 7:13 pm
Location: The City of NOT Spokane
Contact:

Post by Rocketdork » Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:02 pm

Yeah, I've seen this before.

Monsanto developed a strain of wheat that is resistant to roundup...a product they also sell.

The farmers can then plant the seed, and spray with roundup to kill the weeds. The wheat survives and they get a bumper crop.

Monsanto OWNS the strain of wheat, the developed it, I think patented it. They make you sign a contract that you won't replant with seed you've grown. Don't they deserve to make money on the things they have developed? Its not piracy if you signed a contract (actual sig, not a EULA), its breach of contract.

Of course, you don't have to buy THEIR wheat...

And on the other side of the coin...Monsanto has been accused of being a bit unfair. The wheat is a fertile variety (as opposed to sterile) and can cross pollinate with neighboring fields...there have been claims that this happened...don't know the results of the claim.
"A man without a woman is like a statue without pigeons"
User avatar
ZIPPER
fly guy
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Spokane, WA USA
Contact:

Post by ZIPPER » Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:11 pm

The best part about Monsanto's geneticly made wheat is it is banned in Eruope and a lot of other parts of the world. You can't even use geneticly modified foods for animal feed in Eruope. Without labeling laws here in North America, WE are Monsanto's biggest consumers.

I heard a report that over 30% of the food that we consume is geneticly modified. If the government would stop stuffing their pockets and pass a true labeing law, we would see a dramatic reduction in sales and more exports of our excess crops. It is a win-win all around to see a decline in modified ag products.
"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help. " -- Ronald Reagan
User avatar
ironpants
metal butt
Posts: 459
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:09 am
Location: Spokane, WA

Post by ironpants » Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:24 pm

ZIPPER wrote:if the government would stop stuffing their pockets and pass a true labeing law, we would see a dramatic reduction in sales and more exports of our excess crops.
Except that the constitution forbids such activity by the federal government. It has a responsibility to provide for commerce, not quell it.
"The age demanded that we sing, and cut away our tongue. The age demanded that we flow, and hammered in the bung. The age demanded that we dance, and jammed us into iron pants. And in the end the age was handed the sort of shit that it demanded."
User avatar
ZIPPER
fly guy
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Spokane, WA USA
Contact:

Post by ZIPPER » Fri Jan 14, 2005 8:34 pm

A labeling law would let the consumer's decide which product they would want to buy.

Which would you chosse to feed to your children.

GM foods are getting farther and farther from their original strains. Without long term testing we have no idea what affect they could have on the population of the world (including livestock). GM corn that is not allowed by the FDA to be used in food for the consumer is being fed to livestock that finds its way in to the marketplace.

If you think that the government is out for your safety do research on bovine growth hormone and the U.S. milk supply.

"If you're talking about PCBs, Agent Orange, Bovine Growth Hormone, water privatization, biopiracy, untested/unlabeled genetically engineered organisms, or persecuting small family farmers, you're talking about the Monsanto Corporation."
http://www.organicconsumers.org/monlink.html

Alsohttp://www.mindfully.org/GE/RBGH-Alarmi ... sJul95.htm

Don't let Monsanto do this again to us!
"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help. " -- Ronald Reagan
User avatar
bio
Resident Junky
Posts: 6644
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 12:24 pm
Location: Spokane, WA
Has thanked: 26 times
Been thanked: 43 times
Contact:

Post by bio » Fri Jan 14, 2005 8:41 pm

ZIPPER wrote:A labeling law would let the consumer's decide which product they would want to buy.
This is already in place by law on several products. Just go to the record store or buy a pack of cigarettes for an example.

Why not include food?
"That's What"
- She
User avatar
ironpants
metal butt
Posts: 459
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:09 am
Location: Spokane, WA

Post by ironpants » Fri Jan 14, 2005 8:48 pm

bio wrote:
ZIPPER wrote:A labeling law would let the consumer's decide which product they would want to buy.
This is already in place by law on several products. Just go to the record store or buy a pack of cigarettes for an example.

Why not include food?
I would argue that federly mandated labels on cigarettes are outside the mandate of the constitution as well. Not saying they shouldn't be there, just saying the federal government isn't the proper authority. Ever seen the federal government do anything right?

Me neither.
"The age demanded that we sing, and cut away our tongue. The age demanded that we flow, and hammered in the bung. The age demanded that we dance, and jammed us into iron pants. And in the end the age was handed the sort of shit that it demanded."
Post Reply