Free Speech? or FCC having it both ways?

A place for anything and everything.
Post Reply
Pigman

Free Speech? or FCC having it both ways?

Post by Pigman » Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:15 pm

BALTIMORE, Nov. 11 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: SBGI - News) announced today that as a result of ambiguities in the Federal Communications Commission indecency rules, it will not be airing the movie "Saving Private Ryan" on any of its stations which carry programming from the ABC television network. Sinclair deeply regrets not being able to broadcast this highly acclaimed motion picture this evening.

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/041111/phth030_1.html
Pigman

Post by Pigman » Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:17 pm

What pisses me off is that the FCC refuses to provide guidelines to the broadcasters. Also fail to understand why bleeping out the F-Word would ruin the movie.
User avatar
miftah
le moth
Posts: 2703
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 5:15 pm
Location: Assland, OH
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Post by miftah » Thu Nov 11, 2004 4:09 pm

Well Sinclair is the ultra conservative corporation that tried to air the swift boat "documentary" last month in swing states, so I can only guess that this is more of a political move.

Considering the source.
"Fear of the bee means the honey is for me" - Jhonn Balance
User avatar
bio
Resident Junky
Posts: 6644
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 12:24 pm
Location: Spokane, WA
Has thanked: 26 times
Been thanked: 43 times
Contact:

Post by bio » Fri Nov 12, 2004 3:46 pm

Instead, the Sinclair stations showed Oprah.

It was all about celiberity wax jobs. I believe it was called "Saving Meg Ryan's privates".

Or somethin...
"That's What"
- She
Post Reply