Sex with your teacher is sooo 1998...
- bio
- Resident Junky
- Posts: 6644
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 12:24 pm
- Location: Spokane, WA
- Has thanked: 26 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
- Contact:
This falls under the "um... duh" catagory:

Hell... I wouldn't complain today either.
If I was still a horney 16 year old boy and had two hot teachers double-team me... I don't think I'd be crying "foul" eitherTwo female teachers have been suspended for allegedly having a threesome with a 16-year-old male pupil.
But police are understood not to have pressed charges because the teenager did not complain of any crime.

Hell... I wouldn't complain today either.
"That's What"
- She
- She
- eddiecanuck
- resident canuck
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 5:39 pm
- Location: Spokane, WA
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
- bugfreezer
- Arthropoda Cryogenicist
- Posts: 1294
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 11:55 am
- Location: Pullman, WA
- Contact:
- miftah
- le moth
- Posts: 2703
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 5:15 pm
- Location: Assland, OH
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
- Contact:
Well, obviously the vocal complaint against this is the double standard. Men aren't comfortable with the idea that women, and particularly girls, enjoy sex at all. They do (provided their partners aren't slacking). When I was a teenager, I had no difficulty finding girls who not only enjoyed sex, but wanted it as much as I did.
But if the girl said, "I was fingercuffed by two of my teachers, and I had a great time and have no complaints," I guess I'd believe her. I wouldn't call it rape. But teacher student relations are wrong. No matter what gender or age, so I'd still fire the teachers.
But lets make no mistake. Its not rape. 16 year old girls know exactly what they're getting themselves into. Whether daddy wants to admit it or not.
But if the girl said, "I was fingercuffed by two of my teachers, and I had a great time and have no complaints," I guess I'd believe her. I wouldn't call it rape. But teacher student relations are wrong. No matter what gender or age, so I'd still fire the teachers.
But lets make no mistake. Its not rape. 16 year old girls know exactly what they're getting themselves into. Whether daddy wants to admit it or not.
"Fear of the bee means the honey is for me" - Jhonn Balance
- bio
- Resident Junky
- Posts: 6644
- Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 12:24 pm
- Location: Spokane, WA
- Has thanked: 26 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
- Contact:
Thats just a big ol' can of worms.bugfreezer wrote:And what if it were two hunky male teachers and a 16 year old female student?
She also says "no harm, no foul", just to make it even.
The teachers should lose their jobs for violating one of the basic rules of being a teacher: Thou shalt not bang thy students or be banged by thy students. Their actions were inappropriate and inexcusable.
As for charging them with rape... if all parties are willing... it's not rape. The only loophole in that is the age thing. If the student is under the minimum humping age... then it's illegal. Each state has it's own rules and laws on that... your results may vary.
"That's What"
- She
- She
- bugfreezer
- Arthropoda Cryogenicist
- Posts: 1294
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 11:55 am
- Location: Pullman, WA
- Contact:
Yes, I am tagging the double standard. The teachers must be fired. In WA, I understand the age of consent to be 16. If either my sons or daughters were in that mess, I promise I would treat them equally... 

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened.
- Sir Winston Churchill
- Sir Winston Churchill